snowman
10-17-2005, 11:55 AM
Okay, since it'll end up here anyway, I'll start it here.
Some of you affectionately remember me, okay, maybe not affectionately.
Well, I'm back to get from 4.01b to 6.2. Luckily, I came across a guide or two and we'll see how that works.
I personally appreciate guides. They put all the stuff in one nice, neat little package. I wish they weren't frowned upon so much here.
However, the two I've seen both have one thing in common -- donate (or buy me a beer). NOW I understand why the guys here get their drawers in a wad. These are people who certainly made it easier to do the hacking by putting all the info in a nice neat little package, but none of the info was even created by the author of the guide. It's all regurgitated information, gleaned from one site -- this one. Every one of them has "go to ddb and get this, then this, then this".
While I'm against bounties and requests for donations from authors, by golly, at least the people WRITING THE UTILS that allow us to do the hacking actually CREATED something, rather than just writing a book report with links.
Some guides are blessed, some are cursed. Of course, the blessed ones start off by "this is not a guide" :). But the difference in which ones stay and which ones go is.... those requesting donations go.... Those that call themselves a "roadmap" with no request for payment stay.
There are certainly a few folks here who quickly tire of questions by those who just aren't as tivo-centric as they are. A well-written guide is one of the few things that most anyone here can "give back". However, it's when the "giving back" starts becoming a "revenue source" that it gets ugly.
So, in short, "I get it."
Some of you affectionately remember me, okay, maybe not affectionately.
Well, I'm back to get from 4.01b to 6.2. Luckily, I came across a guide or two and we'll see how that works.
I personally appreciate guides. They put all the stuff in one nice, neat little package. I wish they weren't frowned upon so much here.
However, the two I've seen both have one thing in common -- donate (or buy me a beer). NOW I understand why the guys here get their drawers in a wad. These are people who certainly made it easier to do the hacking by putting all the info in a nice neat little package, but none of the info was even created by the author of the guide. It's all regurgitated information, gleaned from one site -- this one. Every one of them has "go to ddb and get this, then this, then this".
While I'm against bounties and requests for donations from authors, by golly, at least the people WRITING THE UTILS that allow us to do the hacking actually CREATED something, rather than just writing a book report with links.
Some guides are blessed, some are cursed. Of course, the blessed ones start off by "this is not a guide" :). But the difference in which ones stay and which ones go is.... those requesting donations go.... Those that call themselves a "roadmap" with no request for payment stay.
There are certainly a few folks here who quickly tire of questions by those who just aren't as tivo-centric as they are. A well-written guide is one of the few things that most anyone here can "give back". However, it's when the "giving back" starts becoming a "revenue source" that it gets ugly.
So, in short, "I get it."